<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aaron Lerch &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aaronlerch.com/blog/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aaronlerch.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SHA-1 Broken?</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronlerch.com/blog/2005/02/16/sha-1-broken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aaronlerch.com/blog/2005/02/16/sha-1-broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronlerch.com/blog/2005/02/16/sha-1-broken/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier reports that SHA-1 has been proven to be broken, although not officially.  For systems with high chances of being attacked, this could be deadly, but for most systems I work on, the chances of this impacting anything significantly are slim to none.
But still, that&#8217;s not the point! The point is that it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html">Bruce Schneier</a> reports that SHA-1 has been proven to be broken, although not officially.  For systems with high chances of being attacked, this could be deadly, but for most systems I work on, the chances of this impacting anything significantly are slim to none.</p>
<p>But still, that&#8217;s not the point! The point is that it&#8217;s not as secure as it should be.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://pluralsight.com/blogs/keith/archive/2005/02/16/5907.aspx">Keith Brown</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aaronlerch.com/blog/2005/02/16/sha-1-broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
